This bone mineral density for bone fracture calculator assesses fracture risk in the following five years based on patient age, BMD T score and personal factors. There is in depth information on lawyerfree.ru and the results provided below the form.
How does this bone mineral density for bone fracture calculator work?
This health tool evaluates 5 year different type of fracture risk based on the age of the patient, their score in the bone mineral density test (BMD T) and some other risk factors. The form is easy to administer by both specialists and patients and provides an immediate prognostic result.
The items used in the bone mineral density for bone fracture calculator are described below:
■ The age of the patient – age is factored in as risky after 65 and posing significant risk after 85;
■ The BMD T score – the lower the score, the higher the fracture risk;
■ Body weight less than 125 lbs (1 point) – indicating frailness;
■ Fractures after age 50 (1 point) – increase of risk with already existing fractures after the threshold age;
■ Maternal hip fracture over 50 years old (1 point) – history of hip fracture in family;
■ Smoker (1 point) – smoking is identified as osteoporosis risk factor and contributes to bone thinning.
Fracture risk interpretation
The components of lawyerfree.ru are weighted differently according to their involvement in weakening bone density and in the increase of fracture outcome.
The following table provides the five year risk percentages in three different types of fractures, according to the overall score obtained after completing the form above:
|Score||5 year risk of fracture|
|1 - 2||8.60%||0.40%||1.20%|
|3 - 4||13.10%||0.90%||2.50%|
|6 - 7||19.80%||3.90%||7.10%|
|8 - 15||27.50%||8.70%||11.20%|
Bone mineral density test (BMD T)
This test is designed to compare the subject’s bone density with normal ranges of healthy adults in the same age range. The T-score consists of the number of units, standard deviations that the subject’s score is above or below the average:
■ Normal levels are between -1 and +1;
■ Levels between -1 and -2.5 are indicative of a low bone mass;
■ Levels below -2.5 are indicative of osteoporosis.
The Z-score result is more complex and takes account of age, gender, weight and ethnical origin.
The BMD tests are usually performed by radiation (which is less than that of a chest x-ray) on bones that are more likely to undergo a fracture:
■ Lumbar vertebrae;
■ Femural neck;
■ Forearm bones.
Low bone mass is not in all cases consistent with osteoporosis as there are other factors to corroborate such as heredity, development of less optimal bone mass during youth year, bone affecting comorbidities or accelerated bone loss.
The following populations are recommended to pursue regular testing:
■ Females over 65 and males over 70;
■ People over 50 with personal history of bone fracture from minor trauma, rheumatoid arthritis or parental hip fracture;
■ People with vertebral abnormalities;
■ People suffering from hyperparathyroidism.
Risk factors for fractures
As a result of either trauma or decreased bone strength, fractures can occur more or less easier depending on underlying factors:
■ Bone strength depends on the shape, the quality and the volume of the bone while density is given by porosity and mineralization;
■ Age, gender and ethnic background are the following risk factors and although similar bone densities might mean a similar prognosis of fracture, females tend to undergo more fractures;
■ Treatment with glucocorticoids and coexistence of rheumatoid arthritis increase risk of bone trauma;
■ Smoking and high alcohol intake (above 2 units daily) lower bone quality by affecting the functioning of bone forming cells;
■ Vitamin D and calcium deficit nutrition;
■ Gait speed in the elderly also affects risk;
■ Type of trauma and force of impact affect relative risk, for example: compared to other directions of fall, falling to the side increases hip fracture risk by 6 times;
■ Sedentary lifestyle;
■ Frequent falls due to loss of balance, visual impairment, long time immobilization or dementia.
1) Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS, Johnell O. (2001) . Osteoporos Int; 12(7):519-28.
2) Krall EA, Dawson-Hughes B. (1994) . Am J Med; 96(1):20-6.
3) Blake GM, Fogelman I. (2007) . Postgrad Med J; 83(982): 509–517.
4) Unnanuntana A, Gladnick BP, Donnelly E, Lane JM. (2010) . J Bone Joint Surg Am; 92(3): 743–753.
5) Lewiecki EM. (2013) . Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec; 56(4):667-76.15 May, 2016